College Football by the Numbers
Unique Approach, Unique Insight
Monday, May 25, 2009
›
The quick and dirty explanation of the NEPA is that we compare a players performance on each play to the FBS average and attach a point valu...
4 comments:
Thursday, April 16, 2009
Individual Statistics
›
Under Renovation
3 comments:
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
CB: RPI sucks; Enter the cRPI
›
Since 1981, college basketball fans and selection committees have suffered under the tyranny of the Ratings Percentage Index (RPI), perhaps ...
10 comments:
Saturday, January 10, 2009
College Football 2008
›
Now that the season's over, it's time to review and rank. The Matrix offers us rankings based on three basic ideas-efficiency, perfo...
3 comments:
Bowl Results
›
Things were going very well until I went 0 for 4 the last four bowl games. Still, the Matrix was 53% against the spread. It correctly pre...
2 comments:
Saturday, January 3, 2009
Time for a Change-the MWC and the BCS
›
I asked at the beginning of the year how many wins the MWC could pull off against BCS conference teams . The answer was 9. They finished 9...
8 comments:
Friday, January 2, 2009
2008 Bowl Picks
›
This is a little bit late, but my computer doesn't know the difference. Winners against the spread are in bold. It's currently run...
6 comments:
Saturday, October 4, 2008
Games to Watch
›
(Complete Week 1 Picks Here) TEAM1 (Record) |Spread| [ ATS ] @ Team2 (Record) [ ATS ] Ohio State (4-1) |-2.5| [-12.9] @ Wisconsin (3-1) [+1....
5 comments:
‹
›
Home
View web version